On Girls:
Question, if a show is watched (legally on a television) mostly by middle aged men, can it still be the voice of a generation?
Granted, it really isn’t THE voice, but A voice, and not really a VOICE, but a HBO SHOW…that no one I know can afford… and almost no one I know says that they watch it…
Anyways, I’ve been catching up on Season 2 with my frosted mini-wheats in the mornings this week and just laughing at the thought of what 40 something year old men like about this show. I hope it is the dry humor and realistic depictions of manhattanites.
As I continue to catch up on these paid cable shows, I am growing tired of the dark comedy character driven formula crap they keep putting on HBO and Showtime. With laughs being delivered slower than a Mad Men plot point, and ironic tongue in cheek credit music, I’d rather try and assemble the puzzle of social issues and sex scenes that is Treme before I sit through another twenty minutes of some of this dramatically delivered comedy garbage.
Don Cheadle, I don’t care if you are going to have some Hamlet Bueller aside while having graphic sex with some girl, your show isn’t funny.
And Enlightenment, your voiceover meditative introductions make no sense in the context of the episode. I accidentally restarted an episode while falling asleep and dreamed I was in some Meg Ryan Nora Ephron Yoga Class.
And Girls, the unbearable number of plot threads you try and pick up each episode with your fast-paced-drum-lined “previously on” montage is worse than Shaky-Cam Cloverfield.
We get it, mom’s can be drug dealers, cancer is a bitch, consultants are screwing everyone over, meditation doesn’t work, and everybody is in general a bad person.
So why do I keep watching these HBO/Showtime Comedies?
Because I am love 30 minute anythings.
Because I get anxiety if I haven’t seen everything on Terri Gross’s Fresh Air or The AV Club and other awards things like those Golden Globe things.
Because I am nostalgic for the times in college when I didn’t understand any of the jokes.
Because I keep waiting for something new.
I guess I shouldn’t expect much from a network targeting 45 year old men, and yet I do.
So let’s recap the first two hours of Girls Season Two:
The first episode of girls, was closer to a MTV Where-Are-They-Now-Special than a actual half hour of television.
Then, PSAyeF***YouEpisodeTwo quickly addressed the race card and all other criticisms of the cast of Girls in one neat little episode so it can never be addressed again.
Episode Three was a coked-out Girl’s night out teen movie in miniature.
And Episode four was the closest thing to a Judd Apatow movie, and because of that I thought it was absolutely hilarious, if only for the use of the term “snot rocket”.
Overall, the show has its moments, but I feel bored and let down a little too often for my comfort. I like that characters are calling each other on their bullshit, but I feel like the show is mean, and doesn’t given anyone, outside of Hannah, any room to be likeable.
I think most of my disappointment for this show comes from the impression I have of what it should be, a Judd Apatow movie about people like my friends. Judd is really great at finding young talent, and encourages this story-telling kind of humor that airs out everyone’s crazy thoughts and sees how people might really react to it. And I love that and I hope that Girls can get to that point. Sometimes it does.
Other times I feel I am disappointed when I think about how fun it is to hang out with the characters on New Girl and Happy Endings, and Parks and Recreation and how I don’t want to hang out with these Girls (and Boys). The silliness of broadcast sitcoms is of a different breed, but they seem, at least to me, to beg for some comparison. And as these sitcoms continue to take risks in dramatic moments and ask us as viewers to care about these characters, it is easy for me to do so because I like them and I want to be with them. Yet when Girls asks me to care that someone loses a job or is hurt by a friend, I don’t feel much because I think, damn right, screw you.
Still I think, nope, I love the cast, I love Lena, this show is hilarious…
I just hate the people that think it is hilarious. Something sincerely bugs me about Girls’ fans. This idea that this autobiographical show is this great exciting moment where we can tune in and laugh at the stories that are about our generation just rubs me the wrong way. The show hits a very specific life style right on the nose so well that it has a entire vain following of twenty somethings thinking this is some inside joke. I just hear that talk and I feel like I am poor and being asked to go to sushi on a Saturday after I have been eating rice flavored with chicken bouillon cubes all week and trying not to be embarrassed that I don’t have a stipend. But this is more personal anxiety than actual criticism.
For me, the show is strongest when the characters aren’t twenty somethings struggling to find themselves or a career or love. It is best when it they are just characters doing things that I do, like sing in the bath tub, or compliment my own cooking, or have awkward conversations with friend’s boyfriends. And maybe for the twenty somethings that live like these Girls, this is a show that is like that all the time. But for me, I wish that the characters were more likeable, hangout-able, Apatow-able, and the fans not so vain that they think the show is about them.
Then again, what do I know, I am not forty something.